Errata
Via Chicago
—• CONTENTS •—
— Errata Movie Podcast —

Something about endorsing a political candidate is belittling. Idealists who criticize an administration's actions or a candidate's plans have the moral high ground until they attach their support to an entire package rather than a single issue. Suddenly, oh, he's one of those Dean advocates, or Bush advocates. Suddenly she faces the cold reality of politics, which is compromise.

And so it is with a movie critic who lists his or her favorite movies of the year. You can't vote for just part of a political candidate — just his foreign policy, say, or just his convivial nature — and you can't watch only your favorite parts of movies until you've found them. I'm afraid that buying a ticket entitles you to every frame.

You can, however, stick to your guns, admit that each of your movie choices for the year is a compromise, that it has aspects that are less than perfect, but so be it. Somehow it works. Somehow it stands out from the available options, and the critic does his best to get the word out. Of course only one political candidate can win a given race, but unless you bow to the Oscar god, that isn't true for movies. You can see and enjoy more than one movie in a given year. You can see and enjoy a hundred. So a critic can champion overlooked movies without stealing votes from the front-runners.

Which is another way of saying what I've already said, I think, but this is nevertheless what I'm thinking as I try to sort out 2003, which I'm attempting to do even as the holiday jingle is stealing time from blogs and the allure of cookies is muddling the movie-soaked brain of someone who lives the rest of the year in the dark interior of a theater, or so it seems, where the naughty and nice are on display at 24 frames per second.

Happy holidays. More to come in the following days...

Posted by davis | Link