Coming up this week, one item on TV and the rest for folks in the Bay Area:
I'd agree that you should see Twentynine Palms anyway, especially if liked Dumont's earlier films. It has all the ingredients of his earlier work until it goes hideously awry (IMO anyway) in the last ten minutes or so. But it is so off track and mean spirited that the audience reaction after the screening is almost an experience in itself. :)
Unfortunately, I haven't yet seen his earlier work, but I wanted to catch Twentynine Palms while I could. I'll try to catch something else on video soon.
Anyway... yeesh. Hideously awry is right, although there may be some method to the madness. I'm still mulling it over and will post some more thoughts in a day or so.
Unfortunately I had to squeeze the movie into a weekday matinee, so the theater had a handful of other gluttons for punishment on a sunny afternoon. Not a squeeler in the bunch, I'm sad to say. Just stoic pros. :-)
Cool, looking forward to your comments. I think I've mentioned before that I really didn't know what to completely make of the film just after the screening, and it was the Q&A with Dumont afterward that really made me feel more negatively about it. I was kinda hoping that some aspects were more like bad judgments or poorly executed ideas rather than being intentional elements in the film.
Anyway, the Rendez-vous with French Cinema series is always a mixed bag: half are hardcore cinephiles while the other half are more like French expatriates getting a taste of being home (There were plenty of wine and cheese receptions along the way, none of which I attended because it involved losing my seat for the next screening.). Part of the entertainment for me was hearing a lot of choice words in multiple languages being shouted after the screening. :)